ThriveKS · Source LibraryBack to public record
Evidence archive

Source Library

This library describes the official records used to build the Leavenworth County data-center public record. It distinguishes preserved primary documents from items referenced by officials but not located in the public postings reviewed through August 25, 2026.

Source hierarchy: primary documents and official votes → official meeting recordings → consultant analyses → attributed representations → public testimony. The site does not elevate a public-comment claim to verified fact unless another source supports it.

Board of County Commissioners

Core chronology and formal actions.

May 13, 2026 — BOCC

Official minutes record adoption of the 90-day moratorium by motion, 3–2.

Verified actionOfficial minutes + recording

June 10, 2026 — BOCC

Packet preserves a revised regulation draft and separate draft moratorium resolutions; minutes record no action on those moratorium drafts.

Primary documentsBOCC packet + minutes

July 22, 2026 — BOCC

Kutak Rock authorization for specialized legal services related to the proposed data-center development; cost identified as coming from Cloverleaf funds.

Professional workRBA + official minutes

August 5, 2026 — BOCC

Motion to extend the data-center moratorium through January 31 failed 2–3.

Verified actionDraft resolution + official minutes

August 19, 2026 — BOCC

Packet includes draft Resolution 2026-14, Stifel's preliminary gross-revenue analysis, and SMH roadway materials. Official recording states a proposal came forward the previous day and records the moratorium item being tabled.

Official recordingPrimary documents

August 26 packet — draft Aug. 19 minutes

The draft Aug. 19 minutes embedded in the later packet omit the Resolution 2026-14 discussion that appears in the official recording. The public record page notes this discrepancy without attempting to resolve it.

Records discrepancy

Planning Commission

Official regulation work sessions, hearing record, and vote.

July 8, 2026 — Planning Commission work session

Data-center and BESS regulation work session covering zoning pathways, development agreements, water/cooling, setbacks, sound, monitoring, inspections, and infrastructure.

Packet + recordingVideo ID MDu9_GIBXiA

August 12, 2026 — DEV-26-100

Public hearing on the proposed language amendments. The Planning Commission voted 8–1 to table DEV-26-100 and request a joint BOCC/Planning Commission work session. Andrew Gribble voted no.

Verified actionVideo ID XBpuvviwUm4

Primary project / consultant documents

Documents preserved from official County packets.

Cost Funding Agreement — Project Bluestem

Publicly posted in the May 6 packet. Names Western Meadowlark ProjectCo LLC and the County; establishes a $450,000 initial fund and a $500,000 aggregate cap without developer consent for eligible third-party expenses. The posted copy is unsigned and undated; an executed copy was not located.

FoundMay 6 BOCC packet

Stifel — Preliminary Analysis of Anticipated Gross Public-Sector Revenues

August 2026 report preserved in the Aug. 19 packet. Models a conceptual ±1,145.5-acre project, 1.2 GW electrical load, and gross public-sector revenues under unincorporated and annexation scenarios. It does not quantify project-related governmental costs.

FoundAug. 19 BOCC packet, 27-page report

SMH Phase 1 roadway engineering

$99,650 proposal preserved in the Aug. 19 packet with scope, fee schedule, qualifications, schedule, and written no-conflict statement.

FoundAug. 19 BOCC packet

Kutak Rock authorization

Selection/scope summary and Board authorization are public. The executed engagement agreement, submitted proposals, and separate conflict disclosure were not publicly located.

Found in partJuly 22 BOCC materials

Regulation version history

Four distinct drafts were preserved.

April 29 / May 6

Initial BOCC draft preserved in May 6 packet.

Found

June 10

Revised BOCC work-session draft.

Found

July 8

Planning Commission work-session draft.

Found

August 12 — DEV-26-100

Public-hearing draft; tabled 8–1 for further work.

Found

Referenced but not publicly located

These gaps are part of the record and are not filled with assumptions.

Formal Aug. 18 application

Official Aug. 19 recording says a proposal came forward the previous day, but the public archive review did not locate the application package, case number, plans, or attachments.

Not located

Underlying Evergy 1.2 GW calculation

Stifel attributes its electricity-cost estimate to Evergy; the underlying Evergy study/calculation was not posted with the report.

Not located

Project-specific Suburban Water record

No written Project Bluestem will-serve/capacity/water-right record was located in the reviewed official sources.

Not located

Executed project agreements

No publicly posted Project Bluestem development agreement, community-benefit agreement, PILOT, tax-abatement, or incentive agreement was located.

Not located

Official repositories

Use these County pages to independently review current postings.

Some County navigation links generated malformed duplicate paths during the archive audit; corrected official root URLs were used when necessary.